Preserve the source
Original time information remains available instead of being overwritten by the prepared output.
In-house operating workflow
A recurring process for recorded time, adjustments and exceptions, organised so preparation becomes more consistent while final approval stays with a person.
Source entries and the relevant week are brought together.
Known corrections or paid-time changes remain explicit.
Unclear or unusual items are separated for attention.
The prepared output is checked before approval.
The recurring problem
Recorded times are only one input. Adjustments, unusual entries and decisions about how an item should be treated also matter. If those details are handled informally, the review becomes harder to repeat and explain.
The workflow was designed around preparation and visibility—not around removing the person who is responsible for the final check.
Original time information remains available instead of being overwritten by the prepared output.
Changes are recorded explicitly so a reviewer can see what differs from the source.
Ambiguous entries are flagged for a decision rather than silently guessed.
The workflow prepares information; it does not authorise pay or replace the accountable reviewer.
Proof boundary
This is an in-house workflow developed through hands-on small-business operating work. It demonstrates how Crisp Relay approaches repeated preparation, checks and exceptions.
A similar project would first need to understand the client’s own rules, systems, responsibilities and data safeguards. No sensitive payroll or employee data is needed for an initial conversation.
Workflow improvement
Describe what goes in, what needs judgment and what the final output should be. Start with a redacted example or a simple explanation.
Send your brief Start by email. Calls are optional.